Podnieks, Karlis (2009) Is Scientific Modeling an Indirect Methodology? The Reasoner, 3 (1). pp. 4-5. ISSN 1757-0522
|PDF - Published Version|
Official URL: http://www.thereasoner.org/
Imagine, quarks will be retained as a construct in all future physical theories. Do physicists need more than this kind of invariance to claim the "real existence" of quarks and believe in having a "direct representation" of them?
If we consider modeling not as a heap of contingent structures, but (where possible) as evolving coordinated systems of models, then we can reasonably explain as "direct representations" even some very complicated model-based cognitive situations. Scientific modeling is not as indirect as it may seem. "Direct theorizing" comes later, as the result of a successful model evolution.
|Subjects:||B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > B Philosophy (General)|
|Divisions:||University of Latvia > F1 Faculty of Computing|
|Deposited By:||Prof. Karlis Podnieks|
|Deposited On:||27 Nov 2010 09:42|
|Last Modified:||01 Dec 2010 11:28|
Repository Staff Only: item control page