Podnieks, Karlis (2008) Indispensability Argument and Set Theory. The Reasoner, 2 (11). pp. 8-9. ISSN 1757-0522
|PDF - Published Version |
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.
Official URL: http://www.thereasoner.org/
One may take several different positions with respect to the ontological status of scientific entities such as, for example, quarks (quarks can't be observed even in principle). Do quarks "really exist", or are they only a (currently successful) theoretical construct used by physicists in their models? Perhaps, the "least committed" position could be the formalist one: let us define the "real existence" of some scientific entity as its invariance in future scientific theories.
|Subjects:||B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > B Philosophy (General)|
|Divisions:||University of Latvia > F1 Faculty of Computing|
1. Mark Colyvan (2001: The Indispensability of Mathematics, Oxford University Press, 192 pp.)
2. Thomas Jech (2006: Set Theory, Springer, 772 pp.)
3. Akihiro Kanamori (2003: The Higher Infinite: Large Cardinals in Set Theory from Their Beginnings, Springer, 564 pp.)
4. Peter Petersen (2006: Riemannian Geometry, Springer, 408 pp.
|Deposited By:||Prof. Karlis Podnieks|
|Deposited On:||29 Dec 2011 11:39|
|Last Modified:||05 Apr 2013 10:58|
Repository Staff Only: item control page