Zeps, Dainis (2010) Cognitum hypothesis and cognitum consciousness. How time and space conception of idealistic philosophy is supported by contemporary physics. Journal of Consciousness Exploration & Research, 1 (1). pp. 5-15. ISSN 2153-8212
|PDF - Accepted Version|
Official URL: http://jcer.com/
May we imagine that materialistic and idealistic thinkers were both right in all point concerning mind and matter they have quarrelled for centuries? May we imagine that in quarrel for primacy between matter and mind both claims for primacy are right and only our good will is required to accept that ultimate reconciliation? May we imagine that all thinking activity of all men on earth and elsewhere is one collective movement of seeing from our side and essentially one from side of the universe itself? It is only point of good will not of reasoning itself. Neither contemporary physics is about to deny it but rather support.
|Subjects:||B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > B Philosophy (General)|
B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BL Religion
Q Science > QC Physics
|Divisions:||University of Latvia > SR Science and Religion Dialogue. Interdisciplinary Group|
1. Berkeley, George. Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge.
2. Davies, P.C.W. Multiverse Cosmological Models. Australian Centre for Astrobiology, Macquarie University.
3. Diogenes, Laertius. Vitae philosophorum: Peri; bivwn dogmavtwn kai; ajpofqegmavtwn eujdokimhsavntwn.
4. Gibbs, Philip. Event-Symmetric Space-Time. 1998. www.weburbia.com/press/esst.htm
5. Guth, Alan H. Kaiser, David I. Inflationary Cosmology: Exploring the Universe from the Smallest to the Largest Scales. Science. Vol. 307, febr. 2005, pp. 884-890.
6. Hugo de Sancto Victore. Didaskavlikon. in Latin. Patrologia Latina, Vol.
7. Kant, Emanuel. Kritik der reinen Vernunft.
8. Mosterin, Jesus. Anthropic Explanations in Cosmology. pp. 42.
9. Ouspensky, Peter. Tertium Organum. Key to Solving Mysteries of the World. In Russian. 1911.
10. Ouspensky, Peter. New Model of Universe.
11. Ouspensky, Peter. In Search of Miraculous.
12. Ouspensky, Peter. The Model of New Psychology. The Model of New Cosmology.
13. Plato, Timaios".
14. Prideaux, Jeff. Comparison between Karl Pribram's "Holographic Brain Theory" and more conventional models of neuronal computation.
15. Rashewsky, Peter. Rieman Geometry and Tensor Analysis. in Russian. 1967.
16. Schiller, Christoph. Motion Mountain. A hike through and beyond space and time following the concepts of modern physics. www.motionmontain.net
17. Schopenhauer, Arthur. Aphorismen zur Lebensweisheit.
18. Smythies, John. Space, Time and Consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 10, No. 3, 2003, pp. 47-56.
19. Swedenborg & The Holographic Paradigm.
20. Swedenborg, Emanuel. Divine Love and Wisdom.
21. Tegmark, Max. Parallel Universes. Scientific American (May 2003), pp. 30-41.
22. Tegmark, Max. Parallel Universes. Science and Ultimate Reality: From Quantum to Cosmos, honouring John Wheeler's 90th birthday, J.D. Barrow, P.C.W. Davies, & C.L. Harper eds., Cambridge University Press (2003).
23. Teihard de Chardin, P. The Phenomenon of man. N.Y. 1965.
24. Wertheimer, Max. Productive Thinking. Harper & Brothers Publishers N.Y.
25. Williams, Alan T. Consciousness, Physics and the Holographic Paradigm.
26. Whorf, Benjamin Lee. Language, Mind, and Reality.
|Deposited By:||Dainis Zeps|
|Deposited On:||27 Oct 2009 21:17|
|Last Modified:||18 Mar 2010 11:18|
Repository Staff Only: item control page