The Double Rotation as Invariant of Motion in Quantum Mechanics

1. Bohm, David. Wholeness and the Implicate Order. London : Routledge, 2002.

2. Zeps, Dainis. Quantum Distinction: Quantum Distinctiones! Leonardo Journal of Sciences : (LJS), 2009 (8), p. 252-261. Issue 14 (January-June).

3. —. Mathematics as Reference System of Life. Riga : Internet publication, 2009.

4. —. On Reference System of Life. Riga : Quantum Distinctions, 2009. http://www.ltn.lv/~dainize/idems.html.

5. Huang, Kerson. Fundamental Forces of Nature. The Story of Gauge Fields. Singapore : World Scientific, 2007.

6. —. Quarks, Leptons and Gauge Fields. Singapore : Worlds Scientific Publishing Co Pte. Ltd, 1982.

7. Marathe, K.B. and Martucci, G. The Mathematical Foundations of Gauge Theories. Amsterdam : North Holland, 1992.

8. Hestenes, David and Sobczyk, Garret. Clifford algebra to geometric calculus: a unified language for mathematics and physics. Dortrecht, Holland : Reidel Publishing Company, 1987. 165 pp.

9. Baylis, William E. Applications of Clifford Algebras in Physics. s.l. : University of Windsor, 2003. 54 pp.

10. Vince, John. Geometric Algebra for Computer Graphics. London : Springer Verlag, 2008.

11. Doran, C and Lasenby, A. Geometric algebra for physicists. s.l. : CUP, 2003. 589 pp.

12. Zeps, D. Cognitum hypothesis and cognitum consciousness. How time and space conception of idealistic philosophy is supported by contemporary physics. 2005.

13. —. Classical and Quantum Self-reference Systems in Physics and Mathematics. Prague : KAM-DIMATIA Series, 2007. 807, 24pp..

14. Hu, Huping Hu and Wu, Maoxin. Spin as Primordial Self-Referential Process Driving Quantum Mechanics, Spacetime Dynamics and Consciousness. New York : Biophysics Consulting Group, 2003.

15. Penrose, Roger. The Road to Reality. A Complete Guide to the Laws of the Universe. New Yourk : Vintage Books, 2007.

16. Penrose, Rogen and Rindler, Wolfgang. Spinors and Space-Time: Volume 1, Two-Spinor Calculus and Relativistic Fields (Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics). London : Cambridge University Press, 1987.

17. Hestenes, David. CLIFFORD ALGEBRA AND THE INTERPRETATION OF QUANTUM MECHANICS. Reidel : in Clifford Algebras and their Applications in Mathematical Physics, 1986. 321-346.

18. Smolin, Lee. Three Roads to Quantum Gravity. New Yourk : Basic Books, 2001.

19. —. The Trouble with Physics. The Rise of String Theory, the Fall of a Science and What Comes Next. s.l. : A Mariner Book, 2006.

20. Hardy, Lucien. Quantum mechanics, local realistic theories, and Lorentz-invariant realistic theories. s.l. : Phys. Rev. Lett. , 1992. 68, 2981 - 2984.

21. Lundeen, J.S. and Steinberg, A.M. Experimental joint weak measurement on a photon pair as a probe of Hardy’s Paradox. University of Toronto : Toronto, 2008. arXiv:0810.4229v1.

22. Yokota, Kazuhiro, et al. Direct observation of Hardy’s paradox by joint weak measurement with an entangled photon pair. http://www.njp.org/ : New Journal of Physics, 2009. 11, 033011 (9pp).

23. Whorf, Benjamin Lee. Language, Mind and Reality. 1952. pp. Vol. IX, No 3, 167-188.

24. Zeps, Dainis. Cogito ergo sum. 2008.

25. Hall, Brian C. Lie Groups, Lie Algebras, and Representations. An Elementary Introduction. New Yourk : Springer, 2003.

26. Rashewsky, Peter. Rieman Geometry and Tensor Analysis. In Russian. 1967.

27. Steiner, Rudolf. Die vierte Dimension. Mathematik und Wirklichkeit. R. Steiner Verl., 1995, 310 pp. . Dornach : R. Steiner Verlag, 1995.

28. Wigner, E. The unreasonable effectiveness of Mathematics in the natural science. 1960. pp. 1-14. www.math.ucdavis.edu/~mduchin/111/readings/hamming.pdf.

29. Woit, Peter. Not Even Wrong. The Failure of String Theory and the Continuing Challange to Unify the Laws of Physics. London : Jonathan Cape, 2007.

30. Girard, Patrick R. Quaternions, Clifford Algebras and Relativistic Physics. Basel : Birkhauser, 2007.

31. HESTENES, DAVID and ZIEGLER, RENATUS. Projective Geometry with Clifford Algebra. 1991 : Acta Applicandae Mathematicae. Vol. 23, 25–63..

32. Hestenes, David. Point Groups and Space Groups in Geometric Algebra. Tempe, Arizona, USA : Department of Physics and Astronomy, Arizona State University,. Computational Geometry - 4-1.

33. Bohm, David. Quantum Mechanics.

34. Hiley, B. J. Non-commutative Geometry, the Bohm Interpretation and the Mind-Matter Relationship. 2000.

35. Lando, Sergei K and K, Zvonkin Alexander. Graphs on Surphaces and Their Applications. s.l. : Springer, 2003.

36. Ouspensky, Peter. Tertium Organum. Key to Solving Mysteries of the World. In Russian. 1911.

37. Isham, Chris J. Modern Differential Geometry for Physicists. New Jersey : World Scientific, 2003.

38. Nakahara, M. Geometry, Topology and Physics. New York : Taylor & Francis, 2003.

39. Landau, L.D and Lifshitz, E.M. Mechanics, in Russian. M : Gosizd. fiz.mat.lit., 1958.

40. Vladimirov, J. S. Geometrofizika. In Russian. M. : s.n., 2005.

41. Zeps, Dainis. Four levels of complexity in mathematics and physics. Riga : Quantum Distinctions, 2009. http://www.ltn.lv/~dainize/idems.html.

42. —. Mathematical mind and cognitive machine (In Latvian). 2008. p. 11.

43. —. Rudolf Steiner on mathematics and reality. In Latvian. 2008. p. 7 pp.

44. —. The trouble with physics. How physics missed main part of the observer and what comes next. Riga : s.n., 2008. p. 9.

45. —. Trouble with physical interpretations or time as aspect of reference system of life. 2008.

46. Tegmark, Max. Mathematical Universe. 2007. arXiv:0704.0646v2.

47. Berezin, F. A. The Method of Second Quantization. Moscow : Nauka, 1965. In Russian, 235 pp.

48. Dorst, Leo, Fontijne, Daniel and Mann, Stephen. Geometric Algebra for Computer Science. An Object-Oriented Approach to Geometry. 2007.