Glorifying Elohim with Dispositive and Probative Facts for Subsequent Motions:Nosce Te Ipsum (A Logic and Mathematics’ Approach)

Bell, Dallas (2018) Glorifying Elohim with Dispositive and Probative Facts for Subsequent Motions:Nosce Te Ipsum (A Logic and Mathematics’ Approach). In: 2019 Science of Consciousness, Switzerland. (Submitted)

[thumbnail of Glory.docx] Microsoft Word - Submitted Version
60kB
[thumbnail of Glory.pdf] PDF - Submitted Version
797kB

Official URL: https://www.SystematicPoliticalScience.com

Abstract

Pythagoras made the imperative “Man know thyself; then thou shalt know the Universe and God.” One of the Egyptian Luxor Temple proverbs is "Man, know thyself, and you are going to know the gods” and another is "The body is the house of God.” In some ways all classical literature addresses this question. Shakespeare’s asked the famous question, “To be, or not to be, that is the question,” which can be said, “To (X) be (Ǝ), or (V) not (¬) to (X) be (Ǝ), that is (=) the question (a known unknown, ?),” or ((X) Ǝ) V (¬ (X) Ǝ) = ?. Dispositive and probative facts for subsequent motions can be shown as proof of knowing God, which can be simply stated with logic and mathematics: know (cog) God (I) therefore, ∴, know (cog) thyself (X), or cog (I) ∴ cog (X), reducible to I ∴ X. Then, know self because, ∵, know God, or cog (X) ∵ cog (I), reducible to X ∵ I. Human potential to know themselves can then represented as the set {cog (I) + cog (X) + glor (I)} ⊂ {δt + δs}.

Item Type:Conference or Workshop Item (Paper)
Subjects:B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > B Philosophy (General)
B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BR Christianity
Q Science > QA Mathematics (General) > QA01 Combinatorics
P Language and Literature > P Philology. Linguistics
B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BJ Ethics
ID Code:380
Deposited By: Dallas F. Bell
Deposited On:11 Dec 2018 13:39
Last Modified:06 Feb 2021 14:42

Repository Staff Only: item control page