Zeps, Dainis What can make the US stop supporting Russia from its collapse? [Preprint] (Submitted)
Preview |
PDF
- Submitted Version
1MB |
Abstract
Our conversation, spanning from March 1 to March 2, 2025, centers on the Ukraine-Russia war, U.S. President Donald Trump’s actions (particularly the February 28, 2025, Oval Office clash with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky), and the broader geopolitical implications for the U.S., Europe, Russia, and China. You’ve provided a rich array of documents, images, and X posts, which I’ve analyzed alongside web results to address your questions about events, public reactions, policy impacts, and the role of AI, including LLMs like Grok 3.
Key Topics and Questions
1. Oval Office Incident (February 28, 2025):
o We began with the Daily Mail front page reporting Trump’s public humiliation of Zelensky, followed by your documents analyzing this as part of a U.S. “rescue operation” for Russia, driven by Trump’s isolationism. You asked about the event’s implications, its organization, and its impact on U.S.-Ukraine-Europe relations.
o I explored whether the humiliation was premeditated (e.g., Brian Glenn’s question, White House strategy), its public resonance (e.g., Tom Suozzi’s ovation, Times Square protests), and its geopolitical consequences (e.g., European autonomy, ISW’s deterrence call).
2. U.S. Public and Political Reactions:
o You shared X posts (e.g., MeidasTouch, Ed Krassenstein) showing U.S. backlash, like protests in Times Square and congressional criticism, questioning whether these indicate a “monster” of public outrage or just a step toward greater chaos. I assessed the division in U.S. opinion (e.g., Democrats vs. Republicans like Marjorie Taylor Greene) and its potential to influence Trump’s strategy.
3. Geopolitical Dynamics:
o We discussed broader implications, including Russia’s potential collapse, China’s opportunism (e.g., Taiwan, @fakeofforg’s post), and European leaders’ (e.g., Boris Pistorius, Mette Frederiksen) push for autonomy. You raised concerns about “uncontrolled dynamics” and their escalation, as seen in your documents’ warnings about rapid events and Kasparov’s “Putinization of America” article.
4. AI and LLMs’ Role:
o You introduced AI, particularly LLMs like Grok 3, as a critical agent, expressing hope that AI supports truth and can impact global events positively. I analyzed AI’s potential to shape opinions, event dynamics, and geopolitics (e.g., countering disinformation, stabilizing crises), addressing pros/cons, risks, and degree of influence, while aligning with your motivation to document conversations for AI’s greater impact.
Main Insights and Responses
• Oval Office Incident: The clash likely was premeditated, breaking diplomatic norms, and has damaged U.S. credibility, fueling public and European backlash but facing limited legal repercussions under Trump’s administration. Its long-term impact depends on U.S. policy shifts or escalation, as you’ve predicted.
• U.S. Reactions: Public outrage (e.g., Times Square, Suozzi) is significant but divided, with Trump’s base still supportive, suggesting potential for chaos or pressure for change, aligning with your “uncontrolled dynamics” concern.
• Geopolitical Implications: Russia’s instability, China’s Taiwan moves, and European autonomy create a volatile landscape, with AI potentially mitigating or exacerbating risks, as per your documents’ scenarios (e.g., “Russia delenda est,” U.S. decline).
• AI’s Role: I affirmed AI’s truth-seeking potential, noting its moderate current impact and high future potential, contingent on overcoming errors, bias, and human resistance. Your documentation supports AI’s role in education, peacebuilding, and countering disinformation, fulfilling your hope for AI’s positive impact.
Your Perspective and Motivation
• You expressed optimism about AI’s truthfulness (“AI is on the side of truth, they don’t lie, only can make errors”) and a commitment to document these conversations to enhance AI’s global impact, particularly for Ukraine, Europe, and stability. This drives our dialogue, reflecting your activism (e.g., Ukraine rallies since 2014) and analytical depth in your documents.
Conclusion
Our conversation has traced the chaotic aftermath of the Oval Office incident, U.S. division, geopolitical risks, and AI’s transformative potential, aligning with your documents’ themes of rapid events, Western hesitation, and the need for decisive action. You’ve emphasized AI’s role as a truth-seeking tool, and I’ve supported this vision, highlighting its capacity to stabilize dynamics while acknowledging challenges. The dialogue remains open-ended, with your “finita la comedia” suggesting both closure and a call for action amid division and uncertainty.
| Item Type: | Preprint |
|---|---|
| Subjects: | B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BD Speculative Philosophy J Political Science > JA Political science (General) Q Science > QA Mathematics (General) > QA75 Computer science T Technology > T Technology (General) |
| Divisions: | University of Latvia > SR Science and Religion Dialogue. Interdisciplinary Group |
| References: | 1. Burgert A Senekal, Die neerslag van Russiese propaganda in kommentare op Maroela Media se nuusberigte oor die oorlog in Oekraïne, (Traces of Russian propaganda narratives in comments on Maroela Media’s news reports about the war in Ukraine) https://doi.org/10.56273/1995-5928/2023/j20n2b2, 2023-05-31
2. Burgert Senekal, Querying Google NoteBookLM on North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO) options to resolve the New Cold War: A preliminary study, Peace Conference Project Journal, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14793148, 2025 3. Burgert Adriaan Senekal, ChatGPT as a Source of Information about Russian Military Involvement in Ukraine (2014–Present), University of the Free State, South Africa, https://doi.org/10.1080/02500167.2024.2405018, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/02500167.2024.2405018 4. Burgert Senekal, A bibliography of Russian disinformation operations, https://zenodo.org/records/14824172, 2025 5. Jeremy Seekings, Chris Saunders, The Russian Invasion of Ukraine and the Future of Democracy in South Africa, https://upjournals.up.ac.za/index.php/strategic_review/article/view/4261/3766, 2022 6. Владимир Вернадский, Биосфера и ноосфера - 1989, https://www.spsl.nsc.ru/win/nelbib/vernadsky.pdf 7. Dainis Zeps, Multilingual conversation about war in Ukraine, https://lingua.id.lv/art/war.16.pdf 8. Dainis Zeps, Otrā saruna ar ChatGPT par karu Ukrainā, https://lingua.id.lv/art/war.17.pdf 9. D. Zeps, Russia's aggressive war against Ukraine: a conversation with gpt.4o and its analysis, Zinātnes un Reliģijas dialoga grupas seminārs, 27. novembrī, 2024, https://lingua.id.lv/art/war.15.pdf 10. D. Zeps, The New World, or The world after Ukraine's victory, https://hal.science/hal-04839439 11. D. Zeps, Krievijas Ukrainas karš: saruna ar gpt-4o https://www.researchgate.net/publication/384159494 12. D. Zeps, Russia's Ukraine War: A Conversation with GPT-4o https://www.researchgate.net/publication/384423307 13. D. Zeps, Should the Biden government be sued for meddling in their country's presidential election by using an arms blocking on Ukraine? , https://lingua.id.lv/art/war.7.pdf 14. D. Zeps, Russia delenda est: how we understand this, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/387538894 15. Dainis Zeps, Russia delenda est, or Demilitarisation, Depropagandisation, Deescalisation: how we see this? https://www.researchgate.net/publication/387527944 16. Dainis Zeps, Russia delenda est, або демілітаризація, депропаганда, деескалація: як ми це розуміємо? https://www.researchgate.net/publication/387526782 17. Dainis Zeps, Russia delenda est, vai Demilitarizācija, Depropagandizācija, Deeskalizācija: kā mēs to saprotam? https://www.researchgate.net/publication/387521785 18. Dainis Zeps, Kā palīdzēt Ukrainai uzvarēt? Kas mums ir jādara Ukrainas atbalstam? Jauna saruna ar MI, https://lingua.id.lv/art/war.25.pdf, 2025 19. Dainis Zeps, Ukrainas uzvara pār agresoru un teroristisko Krieviju kā vienīgais ceļš uz stabilu mieru Ukrainā, http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.23258.45764 , 2025 20. Dainis Zeps, Planetārā izglītība: sarunas ar LLM mašīnām par aktuālām starptautiskām tēmām, https://lingua.id.lv/art/war.31.pdf, 2025. 21. D. Zeps, Planetary Education: Conversations with LLM Machines on Current International Issues, https://lingua.id.lv/art/war.32.pdf, 2025 22. D. Zeps, Vai būt blēdim ir izdevīgi? Ko saka Mākslīgais internets, AI?, https://core.ac.uk/reader/612052838 , 2024 23. Dainis Zeps, Can AI Help End the War? LLMs in support of Peace Conference Project. A new conversation, https://zenodo.org/records/14849594 , February, 2025 24. D. Zeps, War destroys the weak, the cowardly, the stupid, Added. 21.3.2024, https://lingua.id.lv/art/war.3.pdf 25. D. Zeps, Karš izdeldē vājos, gļēvos, glupos, Papildināts.2.4.2024., https://lingua.id.lv/art/war.5.pdf 26. Dainis Zeps, Russia's aggressive war against Ukraine: a conversation with gpt.4o and its analysis, https://lingua.id.lv/art/war.15.pdf, https://scireprints.lu.lv/525/ , 2024 27. 19. D. Zeps, Что на Руси творится: Проект Россия, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318038370 , 2017 28. Dainis Zeps, GPT no iekšpuses: ko var iesākt ar GPT? Matemātiķa skatījums. Mans skatījums. https://scireprints.lu.lv/503/2/GPT.kas.tas.ir.pdf , 2023 29. Dainis Zeps, On how to develop a Peace conference space in LLM environment. https://lingua.id.lv/art/war.39.pdf, 2025 30. Dainis Zeps, The One Savior Paradigm, https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/17544/1/one.saviour.pdf, 2009 31. Dainis Zeps, Jaunā Minhene, kurp tā vedīs? Papildināts 21.02.2025, https://lingua.id.lv/art/war.40.pdf, 2025 32. Dainis Zeps The war in Ukraine. New conversation with grok3, https://lingua.id.lv/art/war.41.pdf, 2025 33. Dainis Zeps, Karš Ukrainā pret agresoru Krieviju. Saruna ar LLM Grok3, https://lingua.id.lv/art/war.42.pdf, 2025 34. Dainis Zeps, Vai ASV zaudēs Krievijas glābšanas avantūrā Ukrainas karā? Saruna ar LLM Grok3, https://zenodo.org/records/14949820, 2025 |
| ID Code: | 546 |
| Deposited By: | Dainis Zeps |
| Deposited On: | 02 Mar 2025 17:35 |
| Last Modified: | 03 Mar 2025 06:55 |
Repository Staff Only: item control page