Zeps, Dainis
(2010)
*Mathematics is Physics.*
Prespacetime Journal, 1
(3).
pp. 299-313.
ISSN 2153-8301

Preview |
PDF
- Updated Version
745kB |

Official URL: http://prespacetime.com/index.php/pst/article/view...

## Abstract

In series of articles we continue to advance idea that mathematics and physics is the same. We bring forward two basic assumptions as principles. First is the primacy of life as opposed to dominating reductionism, and second – immaturity of epistemology. Second principle says that we have reached stage of epistemology where we have stepped outside simple perceptibility only on level of individuality (since Aristotle) but not on level of collective mind. The last stage have reached only most of religious teachings but not physical science that is still under oppressive influence of reductionism. This causes that what we call research in physical science turns out to be simply instrumental improvement of perception within visional confinement we call field of information. We discuss and try to apply principle that within field of information we can’t invent or discover anything that doesn’t exist.

Item Type: | Article |
---|---|

Uncontrolled Keywords: | quantum mechanics, mathematics, physics, cognitive machine, mathematical mind, field of information, instrumentality versus rationality, religious teachings. |

Subjects: | Q Science > Q Science (General) Q Science > QA Mathematics (General) B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BL Religion Q Science > QC Physics > QC01 Quantum mechanics B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BD Speculative Philosophy Q Science > QC Physics |

Divisions: | University of Latvia > SR Science and Religion Dialogue. Interdisciplinary Group |

References: | 1. Smolin, Lee. The Trouble with Physics. The Rise of String Theory, the Fall of a Science and What Comes Next. : A Mariner Book, 2006.
2. Woit, Peter. Not Even Wrong. The Failure of String Theory and the Continuing Challange to Unify the Laws of Physics. London : Jonathan Cape, 2007. 3. Wigner, E. The unreasonable effectiveness of Mathematics in the natural science. 1960. pp. 1-14. www.math.ucdavis.edu/~mduchin/111/readings/hamming.pdf. 4. Hardy, G. H and Snow, C. P. A Mathematician’s Apology. Cambridge University Press;1992. : Cambridge University Press, 1992. 5. Pitkänen, Matti. Topological Geometrodynamics. : Luniver Press, 2006. 824 pp. 6. Gates, S. James Jr. Superstring Theory. The DNA of Reality. : The Teaching Company, 2006. 7. Zeps, Dainis. The Double Rotation as Invariant of Motion in Quantum Mechanics. : Prespacetime Journal, Vol 1, No 1 (2010). prespacetime.com/index.php/pst/article/view/1. 8. Zeps, Dainis. Our Ability to Research Comes Before Understanding of What We Research. Riga : scireprints.lu.lv/83, 2010. 11pp. 9. Zeps, Dainis. On to what effect LHC experiments should arrive. Riga, 2007. scireprints.lu.lv/37/. 10. Zeps, Dainis. Mathematics and physics is the same. In way of its simplification. Riga : Quantum Distinctions, 2009. 11. Zeps, Dainis. Cogito ergo sum. : Quantum Distinctions, 2008. 12. Zeps, Dainis. Quantum Distinction: Quantum Distinctiones! Leonardo Journal of Sciences : (LJS), 2009 (8), p. 252-261. Issue 14 (January-June). 13. Zeps, Dainis. Four levels of complexity in mathematics and physics. Riga, 2009. scireprints.lu.lv/1/. 14. Zeps, Dainis. The trouble with physics. How physics missed main part of the observer and what comes next. 2008. p. 9. quantumdistinction.files.wordpress.com/2008/11/troublewithp ysics.pdf. 15. Zeps, Dainis. Trouble with physical interpretations or time as aspect of reference system of life. : Quantum Distinctions, 2008. 16. Zeps, Dainis. Mathematical mind and cognitive machine (In Latvian). : Quantum Distinctions, 2008. p. 11. 17. D'Aquili, Eugene and Newberg, Andrew B. The Mystical Mind: Probing the Biology of Religious Experience. : Augsburg Fortress Publishers, 1999. 18. Dlyasin, G. Azbuka Germesa Trismegista ili molekularnaja tainopis mishelnija. 2002. 19. Haisch, Bernard. The God Theory. Universes, Zero-Point Fields, And What's Behind It All. San Francisco, CA : Weiser Books, 2006. 157 pp. 20. Radin, Dean. Entangled Minds. Extrasensory Experiences in a Qauntum Reality. : Paraview Pocket Books, 2006. 21. Zeps, Dainis. Cognitum hypothesis and cognitum consciousness. How time and space conception of idealistic philosophy is supported by contemporary physics. : Journal of Consciousness Exploration & Research, Vol 1, No 1 (2010), 2005. jcer.com/index.php/jcj/article/view/2. 22. Zeps, Dainis. Mathematics as Reference System of Life: preliminary observations. 2009. quantumdistinction.files.wordpress.com/2009/12/mathematics reference-system-life2.pdf. 23. Novum Testamentum Graece, Nestle-Aland ed. Stuttgart : Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft, 2001. 27. revidierte Auflage. 24. Saroyan, William. Coming through the rye. Short play. 25. Bernays, Paul. Platonism in mathematics. lectured June 18, 1934. univ. Geneva. 1935. 26. Zeps, Dainis. On Reference System of Life. 2009. quantumdistinction.files.wordpress.com/2009/12/on-reference system-life.pdf. 27. Prideaux, Jeff. Comparison between Karl Pribram's "Holographic Brain Theory" and more conventional. : Virginia Commonwealth University, 2000. http://www.acsa2000.net/bcngroup/jponkp/. 28. Hu, Huping Hu and Wu, Maoxin. Spin as Primordial Self Referential Process Driving Quantum Mechanics, Spacetime Dynamics and Consciousness. New York : Biophysics Consulting Group, 2003. 29. Berkeley, George. Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge. 30. Hiley, B. J. Non-commutative Geometry, the Bohm Interpretation and the Mind-Matter Relationship. 2000. 31. Bohm, David. Wholeness and the Implicate Order. London : Routledge, 2002. 32. Zeps, Dainis. Our abilities to research come before understanding about what we research. (in Latvian), 2009. quantumdistinction.files.wordpress.com/2009/12/mususpejas. pdf. 33. Berezin, F. A. The Method of Second Quantization. Moscow : Nauka, 1965. In Russian, 235 pp. 34. Lundholm, Douglas and Svensson, Lars. Clifford algebra, geometric algebra, and applications. Stockholm : arXiv:0907.5356v1, 2009. 35. Hestenes, David and Sobczyk, Garret. Clifford algebra to geometric calculus: a unified language for mathematics and physics. Dortrecht, Holland : Reidel Publishing Company, 1987. 165 pp. 36. Huang, Kerson. Fundamental Forces of Nature. The Story of Gauge Fields. Singapore : World Scientific, 2007. 37. Huang, Kerson. Quarks, Leptons and Gauge Fields. Singapore : Worlds Scientific Publishing Co Pte. Ltd, 1982. 38. Landau, L.D. un E.M., Lifshitz. Mechanics, in Russian. M : Gosizd. fiz.mat.lit., 1958. 39. Lisi, A. Garrett. An Exceptionally Simple Theory of Everything. 2007. p. 31. arXiv:0711.0770v1. 40. Lundeen, J.S. and Steinberg, A.M. Experimental joint weak measurement on a photon pair as a probe of Hardy’s Paradox. University of Toronto : Toronto, 2008. arXiv:0810.4229v1. 41. Marathe, K.B. and Martucci, G. The Mathematical Foundations of Gauge Theories. Amsterdam : North Holland, 1992. 42. Isham, Chris J. Modern Differential Geometry for Physicists. New Jersey : World Scientific, 2003. 43. Nakahara, M. Geometry, Topology and Physics. New York : Taylor & Francis, 2003. 44. Steiner, Rudolf. Die vierte Dimension. Mathematik und Wirklichkeit. Dornach : R. Steiner Verlag, 1995. 45. Susskind, Leonard. The Cosmic Landscape. String Theory and Illusion of Intelligent Design. New York : Little, Brown and Company, 2005. 46. Whorf, Benjamin Lee. Language, Mind and Reality. 1952. pp. Vol. IX, No 3, 167-188. 47. Yokota, Kazuhiro, et al. Direct observation of Hardy’s paradox by joint weak measurement with an entangled photon pair. http://www.njp.org/ : New Journal of Physics, 2009. 11, 033011 (9pp). 48. Zeps, Dainis. Inside Outside Equivalence in Mathematics and Physics. 2009. quantumdistinction.files.wordpress.com/2009/12/inside outside.pdf. 49. Zeps, Dainis. On functionality of life (in Latvian). Riga : Quantum Distinction, 2009. quantumdistinction.files.wordpress.com/2009/12/dzivibas funkcionalitate.pdf. 50. Tipler, Frank J. The Physics of Christianity. : Doubleday, 2007. . 51. Tipler, Frank J. Structure of the World from Pure Numbers. , 2008. pp. 897-964. arXiv:0704.3276v1. 52. Tipler, Frank J. The Physics of Immortality. : Doubleday, 1994. 53. Zeps, Dainis. Mathematics: Reductionism and Pythagorean Numbers as Reconstruction of Expelled Wholism. (in Latvian), 2009. quantumdistinction.files.wordpress.com/2009/12/matematika redukcionisms.pdf. 54. Vladimirov, J. S. Geometrofizika. In Russian. M., 2005. . 55. Vernadski, Vladimir. Biosphere and Noosphere (In Russian). Moscow, 2002. . 56. Gibbs, Philip. Event-Symmetric Space-Time. : Weburbia Press, 1998. vixra.org/abs/0911.0042. 57. Goldstein, Rebecca. Incompleteness: The Proof and Paradox of Kurt Godel. : W. W. Norton & Company, 2005. 296pp. 58. Lakoff, George and Nunez, Rafael E. Where mathematics comes from. How the embodied mind brings mathematics into being. : Basic Books, 2000. 59. Hardy, Lucien. Quantum mechanics, local realistic theories, and Lorentz-invariant realistic theories. : Phys. Rev. Lett., 1992. 68, 2981 - 2984. 60. Tegmark, Max. Mathematical Universe. , 2007. arXiv:0704.0646v2. 61. Tegmark, Max. Is 'the theory of everything' merely the ultimate ensemble theory? , 1998. arXiv:gr-qc/9704009v2. 62. Tegmark, Max. Parallel Universes. Science and Ultimate Reality: From Quantum to Cosmos, honouring John Wheeler's 90th birthday. : Cambridge University Press, 2003. arXiv:astro-ph/0302131v1. |

ID Code: | 105 |

Deposited By: | Dainis Zeps |

Deposited On: | 28 May 2010 09:52 |

Last Modified: | 06 Feb 2021 14:41 |

Repository Staff Only: item control page